hoge/10584
更新日: 2015-10-30 (金) 15:38:47 (3094d)
I read a lot <a href=" http://www.wrjz.com/cheap-avapro.pptx ">cheap avapro</a> Serious question here. If we only added 162,000 jobs, why did the unemployment rate go “down?” 200,000 new jobs per month is the number necessary to maintain a remotely positive flow (not accounting for new college grads and assuming a steady retirement rate). What will happen when the numbers are revised (presumably down)? 
- ページ: hoge
- 投稿者: Eldridge?
- 優先順位: ä½
- 状態: å®äº
- カテゴリー: 8141695647
- 投稿日: 2015-10-30 (金) 15:38:47
- バージョン: 3
メッセージ
I read a lot <a href=" http://www.wrjz.com/cheap-avapro.pptx ">cheap avapro</a> Serious question here. If we only added 162,000 jobs, why did the unemployment rate go “down?” 200,000 new jobs per month is the number necessary to maintain a remotely positive flow (not accounting for new college grads and assuming a steady retirement rate). What will happen when the numbers are revised (presumably down)?
- このページを共有：
-
このページのURL：
