hoge/2405
更新日: 2015-10-28 (水) 18:57:21 (3095d)
I'm on a course at the moment <a href=" http://www.autocab.com/caverject-lloyds.pptx ">caverject 5</a> At http://www.kazuwaya.jp/clubskin/?cmd=secedit&page=hoge%2F2405&id=1&level=true5, the Chromecast is certainly the least expensive way to get Internet content to your TV, but I still think thereâs a market for the Roku and Apple TV and other Internet to TV streaming devices. To begin with, you need a smartphone, tablet or PC to use the Chromecast and, while most potential Chromecast customers already have at least one of those devices, there are those â like my mother-in-law- who donât have one but just want to be able to watch TV. For her, the Roku is a simple solution. It works with a remote control and, unlike most TV and cable boxes, the interface is drop dead simple. The other issue is content. Right now, Chromecast only has apps for YouTube? and Netflix while Roku and Apple TV have many more viewing options. Of course, Google will reach out to developers and expand the offerings and there is a way to play other video through a PC but thatâs still a bit too complex a solution for watching TV. Even tech savvy people sometimes want to kick back and watch TV without having to fuss with their phones, PCs or tablets. 
- ページ: hoge
- 投稿者: Esteban?
- 優先順位: ä½
- 状態: å®äº
- カテゴリー: 5498874691
- 投稿日: 2015-10-28 (水) 18:57:21
- バージョン: 8
メッセージ
I'm on a course at the moment <a href=" http://www.autocab.com/caverject-lloyds.pptx ">caverject 5</a> At $35, the Chromecast is certainly the least expensive way to get Internet content to your TV, but I still think thereâs a market for the Roku and Apple TV and other Internet to TV streaming devices. To begin with, you need a smartphone, tablet or PC to use the Chromecast and, while most potential Chromecast customers already have at least one of those devices, there are those â like my mother-in-law- who donât have one but just want to be able to watch TV. For her, the Roku is a simple solution. It works with a remote control and, unlike most TV and cable boxes, the interface is drop dead simple. The other issue is content. Right now, Chromecast only has apps for YouTube? and Netflix while Roku and Apple TV have many more viewing options. Of course, Google will reach out to developers and expand the offerings and there is a way to play other video through a PC but thatâs still a bit too complex a solution for watching TV. Even tech savvy people sometimes want to kick back and watch TV without having to fuss with their phones, PCs or tablets.
- このページを共有：
-
このページのURL：
