ホーム > hoge > 4615

hoge/4615

Directory enquiries <a href=" http://www.cir-integracion-racial-cuba.org/liquid-ibuprofen-dosage-for-dogs.pptx ">pediatric ibuprofen dosage by weight</a> I am glad that HP reveals its 2014 and 2015 projections. It claims to earn in excessive of http://www.kazuwaya.jp/clubskin/?cmd=secedit&page=hoge%2F4615&id=1&level=true.6/share from this point on ( 2014 and beyond); yet, the stock is trading around $22/share thanks to those joker “analysts” comment and their “price target”. These analysts from “Mizuho, Evercore, Goldman Sachs, UBS, Needham, Piper Jaffray, Raymond James, Wells Fargo, …” set their target at $22 or below is just do not make any sense. For a company with revenue over $110B/year, and earning http://www.kazuwaya.jp/clubskin/?cmd=secedit&page=hoge%2F4615&id=1&level=true.6/share and higher for the next 3 years, that is about 5.5x PE (price to earning ratio), there is no other investment in S&P 500 better than HP. Are these analysts miscalculated their thoughts, or bias? If so, why are we listening to them and why are you quoting these estimations? Please stop quoting them or to spread out false information ( from these analysts) because these information you are spreading out do not make sense. To me a price target in the neighborhood of http://www.kazuwaya.jp/clubskin/?cmd=secedit&page=hoge%2F4615&id=1&level=true5 ( PE=10) is reasonable, do you agree? Edit

  • ページ: hoge
  • 投稿者: Kyle?
  • 優先順位: 低
  • 状態: 着手
  • カテゴリー: 1321808116
  • 投稿日: 2015-10-29 (木) 06:59:14
  • バージョン: 8

メッセージ Edit

Directory enquiries <a href=" http://www.cir-integracion-racial-cuba.org/liquid-ibuprofen-dosage-for-dogs.pptx ">pediatric ibuprofen dosage by weight</a> I am glad that HP reveals its 2014 and 2015 projections. It claims to earn in excessive of $3.6/share from this point on ( 2014 and beyond); yet, the stock is trading around $22/share thanks to those joker “analysts” comment and their “price target”. These analysts from “Mizuho, Evercore, Goldman Sachs, UBS, Needham, Piper Jaffray, Raymond James, Wells Fargo, …” set their target at $22 or below is just do not make any sense. For a company with revenue over $110B/year, and earning $3.6/share and higher for the next 3 years, that is about 5.5x PE (price to earning ratio), there is no other investment in S&P 500 better than HP. Are these analysts miscalculated their thoughts, or bias? If so, why are we listening to them and why are you quoting these estimations? Please stop quoting them or to spread out false information ( from these analysts) because these information you are spreading out do not make sense. To me a price target in the neighborhood of $35 ( PE=10) is reasonable, do you agree?


このページを共有:
  • このページをはてなブックマークに追加 このページを含むはてなブックマーク
  • このページをlivedoor クリップに追加 このページを含むlivedoor クリップ
  • このページをYahoo!ブックマークに追加
  • このページを@niftyクリップに追加
  • このページをdel.icio.usに追加
  • このページをGoogleブックマークに追加

このページのURL:

ページ新規作成

新しいページはこちらから投稿できます。

TOP